It seems to me so far that Con Law being derived from the Constitution (duh) is a bunch of old farts rambling on for pages at a time, when a couple of sentences would have done the trick. This reminds me of when I converse with old people, and they ramble on and on. Occasionally I will nod that I am listening, but in my head im thinking of other things, all the while catching the drift of what the geezer is telling me. I dont know what I would do without a supplement for this class. Does it get more interesting? Ive never been a history buff.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment